Since there’s a lot of new people trying out Mastodon, something to be cautious about: your DMs can be read by admins of your instance and the instance of the recipient, and when your toots cross an instance boundary, it’s possible for your private toots to get boosted. Some of the privacy guards in place on platforms you’ve used before don’t work the same here.
@futzle Oof, yeah. That’s a major difference all right!
@misty @futzle I've been scratching my head about the way to phrase this and generally came up with..
Admins can't see DMs in the app... if requires going out of my way to log into the DB and do extra work to do it (I never need to log into the box), but there is no native out of the box way to see DMs in the webapp.
and they are best to be considered restricted, not private...
until the crypto is added in a few months, and then we can say your privacy is "secured".
@futzle @misty TBH. I've spent a lot of time telling the Mastodon devs to remove the "direct messages" from the home timeline because a DM is not a toot.
BUT
wondering about this.. I think the reason I get so mad about DMs being in my timeline is because a "limited toot" or "mentioned" or "restricted" is better NAME than direct message.
A limited toot could be on my timeline perfectly fine, but a direct message shouldn't.. and the name is the only problem I have...
I love the feature and function of a DM in mastodon (by any other name)
it's 2022 and Mastodon still hasn't fixed this? jfc implement direct recipients already. Parsing the text for mentions is beyond stupid.
Pleroma already did it. A long time ago.
@misty thanks… I’ve been here for years and didn’t know
@misty good to know except I can’t even find the DM button :)
@misty Mastodon really should incorporate end to end encryption for DMs
@phocks @misty I think that's a different platform, you don't want to be discoverable for that.
Because if you are discoverable, and have views or are "different", you are subject for harassment.
Preventing that harassment must be important to make sure we have a safe environment we can express ourselves in. It's not enough to just ban accounts in retrospect.
@misty so like... if you DM someone from another instance they can get boosted??? or if they're followers-only but not DMs? I'm very confused and also concerned
@raphaelmorgan @misty Na, the people who set up and run the Mastodon software can log into the database on the server and see the DM text, just like the people who have access to the Twitter database can see all your twitter DMs. End to end encryption is the only way to stop this. ie. Use Signal for your private messaging needs.
@raphaelmorgan @phocks My understanding is that post privacy is just a flag on the post. The server on the other side is free to ignore it, so if it doesn't implement private posts (or has been coded to ignore private posts), then it can be boosted just like any other post can.
@misty @raphaelmorgan oh wow that sucks
@raphaelmorgan @misty I think that means boosted as in "stolen" 🤷
@raphaelmorgan @misty sorry yeah I just didn't read that correctly :)
@misty Also on the commercial silos your DMs can be read by the admins. Not?
@VictorVenema It’s a threat model thing. Twitter is a giant company under political scrutiny, with formal logging structures and a low likelihood of anyone with access caring. On Mastodon sysadmins are your peers and you’re exposed to more of them regularly.
@misty My threat model is different. 😎
Corporations do this as cheaply and badly as they can get away with. They pay their employees as badly as they can get away with and they are happy to earn an extra by forwarding private correspondence.
While on Mastodon the admins are most likely honest people, at least in the idealistic building phase we are still in.
In both cases I would never use a DM for something that was important to keep secret. Only to avoid calling out people in public.
@VictorVenema Look, you can nitpick my post all you want but I’m just offering a little friendly advice to new users who don’t know how things work here yet. Go rant on your own timeline.
@misty My apologies. Did not want to nitpick, nor rant.
@misty Thanks for the heads up. I'm still trying to get used to navigating Mastodon and all its other intricacies.
@misty TIL, that admin can read dms.
@misty I don't even know how to send dms. 😂
@misty Thank you.
@misty there is a way to see if my instance allow the admin to read my DM? or this is the default?
There is a more private instance?
I'm still confuse here, I'm so lost LOL
@rtheodoro It’s a technical thing. They’re stored as plain text posts in the database, so someone with access to the server’s database can read them.
@misty Well, The admins *can*. It's not like there's a screen for it in the app? They'd have to dump out the contents of the database.
@fishidwardrobe Yes, and I think users should know that’s possible and easy.
@misty Also, unlike birdsite: DMs go to ~everyone~ mentioned, even in the body, not just the list of users at the start of your toot. So if you want to complain about @user@annoying.server, don’t mention them in full or they’ll get a copy too.